A couple of things:
All I did was generate a compatable binary with current tools from the original source. You still need DOSBox or equivalent to run it. I don't believe it will run under Win32, although providing a minimal capability to do that might be a smallish project. I'm sorry if you think I wrote a Win32 executable.
I agree with you comments ragarding ScummVM, but do not understand why you feel that something like ScummVM is any different than the native Win32 executable.
In the original BASS case, you start Sky.exe (engine) and it automatically reads the SKY.DSK, etc. files and fires up BASS in all its glory.
In ScummVM, you start ScummVM (the engine) with some appropriate arguments, and it automatically reads the SKY.DSK, etc. files and fires up BASS is all its glory.
How is that different? Is it because ScummVM can choose a variety of engines and, therefore, a variety of programs? Or is it because ScummVM also has an interactive mode which allows you to choose a game?
In fact, I've got a BASS distribution which provides a BASS executable which just runs. I assume it fires up ScummVM with the correct arguments, but I haven't investigated it.
TheDumbGamer
Beneath a Steel Sky source code
- DOSGuy
- Website Administrator
- Posts: 1063
- Joined: September 2nd, 2005, 8:28 pm
- Contact:
I wasn't aware that ScummVM could load games without having to start it up and choose a game from the GUI. I guess I should have known that it could accept command line arguments. That certainly eliminates a step.
Well, at any rate, even if it's not Win32, it's still interesting to have been able to compile the source code. I guess it just seemed like you were diminishing your own accomplishment. As I said before, I'm not sure how much I wanted it to be done, but I can at least appreciate that you bothered to do it. Porting it to Win32 would be pretty cool, but even getting it to run in DOS is more than I could have done.
If it was a fun challenge, I say take a bow!
Well, at any rate, even if it's not Win32, it's still interesting to have been able to compile the source code. I guess it just seemed like you were diminishing your own accomplishment. As I said before, I'm not sure how much I wanted it to be done, but I can at least appreciate that you bothered to do it. Porting it to Win32 would be pretty cool, but even getting it to run in DOS is more than I could have done.
If it was a fun challenge, I say take a bow!
Today entirely the maniac there is no excuse with the article.
-
- Less than a nibble
- Posts: 14
- Joined: October 11th, 2006, 2:47 pm
- DOSGuy
- Website Administrator
- Posts: 1063
- Joined: September 2nd, 2005, 8:28 pm
- Contact:
-
- Less than a nibble
- Posts: 14
- Joined: October 11th, 2006, 2:47 pm
- DOSGuy
- Website Administrator
- Posts: 1063
- Joined: September 2nd, 2005, 8:28 pm
- Contact:
-
- Less than a nibble
- Posts: 14
- Joined: October 11th, 2006, 2:47 pm
- DOSGuy
- Website Administrator
- Posts: 1063
- Joined: September 2nd, 2005, 8:28 pm
- Contact:
-
- Less than a nibble
- Posts: 14
- Joined: October 11th, 2006, 2:47 pm